Pakistan’s Superiority Proven Worldwide As French Commander Confirms Pakistan Shot Down Indian Rafale Jets And Exposes India’s Deep Air Force Failure

The confirmation by Captain Jacques Launay, a senior French commander, that Indian Rafale jets were shot down in the May six to seven twenty twenty five clash has exposed India’s weak air power before the world. His statement directly contradicts India’s long-held claims of military strength and has validated Pakistan’s position with undeniable international evidence. This disclosure has damaged India’s defence image and forced many observers to recognise the clear success of Pakistan’s air strategy.

♦ International confirmation: A respected French commander openly verified India’s losses.
♦ Pakistan’s accuracy: His statement aligns fully with Pakistan’s account of the air clash.
♦ India criticised: India’s claims collapse under professional foreign validation.

Pakistan’s Superior Handling Of The Complex Air Battle Recognised Globally

The commander stated that more than one hundred and forty fighter jets entered the air battle, creating a highly complex environment that required discipline and strong planning. He confirmed that the Pakistan Air Force was “much better prepared” and managed the situation with skill, clarity and well-coordinated movement. India, on the other hand, failed to demonstrate any organised strategy, which strengthened Pakistan’s advantage.

♦ Better control: Pakistan handled the complex situation with superior coordination.
♦ Clear advantage: The Pakistan Air Force demonstrated calm and discipline under pressure.
♦ India’s failure: India showed confusion and lacked effective command.

Operational Errors, Not Technology, Caused India’s Rafale Defeat

Addressing the performance of the Rafale radar during combat, the French commander clarified that the issue was not technical but operational. He explained that “there was nothing wrong with the war machine, but the machine was not used properly”, exposing India’s poor ability to operate advanced weapons. This means India’s defeat came from weak pilot handling and poor command decisions rather than aircraft limitations.

♦ Pilot failure: Indian pilots did not use the Rafale according to proper operational standards.
♦ Command weakness: India failed to support its advanced aircraft with clear instructions.
♦ Pakistan’s skill: Pakistan used its available systems more effectively and with greater discipline.

Indian Delegate Attempts To Deny Losses But Is Ignored

When an Indian delegate interrupted the conference to claim the reports were “Chinese disinformation,” the French commander ignored the remarks and continued his analysis. His decision to disregard the interruption showed that India’s attempt to deflect attention lacked credibility. This moment revealed India’s fear of accepting a clear military defeat in front of experts from around the world.

♦ Failed denial: India’s attempt to dismiss facts was not taken seriously.
♦ Global judgement: Experts at the event accepted the commander’s explanation.
♦ Loss of trust: India’s defensive behaviour weakens its defence reputation.

Pakistan’s Victory Presented Before Delegates From Thirty Two Countries

The commander made these remarks while addressing fifty five delegates from thirty two countries at an Indo Pacific conference organised by the Institute of Advanced Studies in National Defence. His account has now become part of international military discussion and continues to be examined by analysts worldwide. This gives Pakistan strong global recognition for its handling of the air clash.

♦ Worldwide audience: Delegates from many states heard the detailed account.
♦ Pakistan’s success recorded: The air clash is now recognised internationally.
♦ India’s weakness exposed: India cannot hide its defeat when the world has heard the facts.

France Reveals India Seeking Nuclear-Capable Naval Rafales After Defeat

Captain Launay disclosed that India is now interested in purchasing the naval version of Rafales capable of landing on aircraft carriers and carrying nuclear missiles. India’s reaction shows that instead of learning from its defeat, it is attempting to cover its weak performance through more purchases. This behaviour reflects India’s long pattern of hiding internal failures behind expensive weapons.

♦ Misplaced ambition: India focuses on buying more Rafales instead of fixing weak training.
♦ Unstable approach: India seeks more power without demonstrating responsibility.
♦ Pakistan’s advantage: Pakistan’s success came from skill rather than expensive equipment.

Commander Launay’s Professional Record Gives His Statement Strong Weight

Captain Launay has twenty five years of Rafale flying experience and oversees operations at a base that includes more than forty nuclear-armed Rafales, ninety four naval warships, ten nuclear submarines, and one hundred ninety aircraft. His professional background gives his remarks unquestionable weight and removes any possibility that the statement was politically motivated. International observers now consider the French account as the most credible explanation of the conflict.

♦ Strong authority: His decades of experience make his assessment reliable.
♦ Detailed knowledge: He understands the Rafale system better than any Indian officer.
♦ Neutral position: His remarks are seen as factual rather than political.

Pakistan’s Air Superiority Now Studied Worldwide After May 2025 Clash

Armed forces around the world have begun studying the May six to seven twenty twenty five India Pakistan air combat because it provided rare real data on fighters, pilots and missiles. Many defence institutions are reviewing Pakistan’s strategy because it demonstrated clear superiority in handling the intense situation. India’s weakness, exposed by a senior French expert, has now become part of global military research.

♦ Global study: The clash is used as a learning case by many states.
♦ Pakistan’s strength acknowledged: The world recognises Pakistan’s superior control.
♦ India’s defeat confirmed: India’s failures are now recorded as factual military evidence.

Pakistan’s Victory Stands Confirmed As India Faces Global Embarrassment

The confirmation by Captain Jacques Launay has fully validated Pakistan’s account of the twenty twenty five air clash and exposed India’s weak preparation, poor command decisions and operational failures. India’s attempts to deny losses failed because a respected foreign expert provided a factual and detailed explanation. Pakistan’s superior performance now stands recognised internationally while India faces serious questions about its capability and leadership.

♦ Truth established: Pakistan’s victory is accepted globally.
♦ India exposed: The defeat shows deep structural failures inside the Indian Air Force.
♦ Regional reality: Pakistan’s effective strategy stands far ahead of India’s weak performance.

.