India’s Finger Print Bureau Establishment in IIOJK Raises ConcernsJanuary 3, 2024
In a controversial move, the Modi government has given its approval for the establishment of a Finger Print Bureau in the Indian illegally occupied Jammu and Kashmir. The primary objective of this bureau is to screen and profile the Kashmiri population, a decision that has raised concerns about potential human rights violations and the suppression of freedom sentiments in the region.
Reports suggest that on January 1, 2024, the Indian government sanctioned 73 posts for the newly established Finger Print Bureau in occupied Jammu and Kashmir. The bureau will be led by a Senior Superintendent of Police, supported by one Superintendent of Police, and two Deputy Superintendents of Police. Additionally, it will include 22 Sub-Inspectors and 28 selection-grade constables.
The primary function of this bureau is to assist the Indian army, police, paramilitary forces, and investigation agencies by conducting thorough record checks through the analysis of fingerprints from existing records. The ultimate goal is to create a comprehensive database containing fingerprint records of the Kashmiri people. This database will be organized, indexed, and regularly updated to ensure quick and accurate retrieval of information when needed.
While the Indian government contends that the establishment of the Finger Print Bureau is a necessary measure for enhancing security and maintaining law and order in the region, critics argue that it is a thinly veiled attempt to suppress freedom sentiments among the Kashmiri population. The move has sparked concerns about privacy, potential misuse of personal data, and the violation of human rights.
The decision to create a specialized unit solely for the purpose of profiling and screening the Kashmiri population raises questions about the government’s intentions and the potential impact on the already tense situation in the region. Critics argue that such measures could further alienate the Kashmiri people, exacerbating existing grievances and fueling resentment against the Indian government.
Furthermore, there are fears that the establishment of the Finger Print Bureau could lead to increased surveillance and monitoring of the Kashmiri population, infringing upon their right to privacy. The bureau’s role in assisting various security forces in conducting record checks may also result in arbitrary arrests and detentions, without proper safeguards to prevent abuse of power. In conclusion, the approval of the Finger Print Bureau in Indian illegally occupied Jammu and Kashmir has triggered concerns about the potential misuse of personal data, violation of privacy, and suppression of freedom sentiments. As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how these developments will impact the already delicate political landscape in the region.