Modi’s Hidden Agenda Behind Abrogation of Article 370 and 35A: Vice President NC

Omar Abdullah, National Conference Vice President, has strongly criticized the Modi-led Indian government for abrogating Articles 370 and 35A. He claims this move was driven by a hidden agenda and was unrelated to the armed struggle in Indian illegally occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK).

In a press conference, Omar Abdullah argued that if IIOJK’s special status had caused the armed struggle, the region would not be facing the current wave of fresh attacks. He pointed out that the BJP had promised complete peace in Jammu and Kashmir after the removal of Article 370, which has not materialized.

Omar Abdullah specifically blamed the BJP for the spike in attacks. “This question should be asked to the BJP, who claim that all militancy is connected with Article 370. The current situation proves that they are careless and not paying attention to their work,” he said.

The NC leader also addressed the Indian government’s claim of holding elections in IIOJK. He referenced the Indian Supreme Court’s directive to complete elections before September 30 and criticized the IIOJK administration for its lack of focus. He accused superior officers of neglecting their duties, leading to a worsening security situation.

Omar Abdullah emphasized that the increase in attacks is a result of the Indian government’s negligence rather than part of the BJP’s hidden agenda. This statement highlights his belief that the central government’s actions have exacerbated the situation rather than resolving it.

The criticism of the abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A is a significant aspect of the ongoing political discourse in IIOJK. These articles granted special autonomy to the region, and their removal has been a contentious issue.

Omar Abdullah’s comments reflect the broader dissatisfaction and unrest in IIOJK. The promises made by the BJP regarding peace and stability in the region have been called into question by the current situation.

The abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A has had profound implications for the region’s political and social landscape. The increase in attacks and the criticism from local leaders like Omar Abdullah underscore the complexities of the situation.

Therefore, Omar Abdullah’s criticism of the Modi government’s actions in IIOJK highlights the ongoing challenges and dissatisfaction in the region. His statements call for a reassessment of the policies and actions that have led to the current state of affairs.