Jailed Yasin Malik Denounces Allegations as Baseless, Hate-driven, and Shameful: A Pattern of Repression

Yasin Malik’s affidavit filed from Tihar Jail is not only the defence of one man. It shows how the state now uses charges, long jail terms and loud media campaigns together to crush voices that seek rights. Malik calls the charges false, hate driven and shameful, and his words point to a wider plan in which police, courts and parts of the media move as one to punish dissent. This is not a single mistake. It is a system that forces people into silence and strips away the normal protections of law and public life.

Detention And The Misuse Of Law

India’s use of criminal law in political cases has become routine and harsh. Long detentions in places like Tihar, public calls for the highest punishments and fast public trials on television all add up to one clear result. The person is punished in public well before any legal finding. When law becomes a tool of power rather than a tool of justice, every citizen loses a basic safety. This practice has sapped trust in courts and left families living in fear for the fate of those who speak out.

Pattern Of Fake Cases :
• Malik’s claim: The charges are made up and then repeated as fact in public.
• Public damage: Repeated headlines destroy a person’s name before the court hears facts.
• Political result: The true aim appears to be breaking political opposition rather than finding truth.

Selective Use Of Agencies :
• Upgraded charges: Agencies push for the harshest punishments in cases that embarrass the state.
• Public spectacle: Seeking heavy sentences in public turns criminal cases into political shows.
• Lost trust: People now doubt that law agencies act on neutral facts and not political ends.

Historical Claims And The Rewriting Of Events

The story of Kashmir’s past now serves present aims. Malik denies any role in the 1990 migration of Kashmiri Pandits and points out that there is no official record tying him to it. Still the version of that event pushed by some groups is used to shut down debate about what really happened and who is to blame. When key events are told in only one way, the search for truth ends and political gain begins. This rewriting of history makes fair discussion impossible and robs future generations of a full record.

Meetings And The Contradiction Of Contact :
• Long contact: Malik says that many national leaders met him openly over years.
• Public meetings: These meetings do not fit the image of a hidden criminal now painted in court filings.
• Demand for clarity: Such contradictions call for calm, independent checks of the facts.

Media Trial And The Role Of Propaganda

A free press is supposed to check power. Instead, many outlets have run with claims that mirror the prosecution and have not clearly separated allegation from proof. News channels and papers have broadcast one sided stories, repeated untested claims and shaped public anger. This media trial makes fair legal process harder and feeds a climate of hate and fear where facts are drowned by noise.

Press Reporting Standards :
• State the facts: Media must clearly say what is alleged and what is proven.
• Avoid rush: One sided reporting punishes before courts have decided.
• Demand evidence: Journalists must insist on documents and records rather than repeat rumours.

Human Cost: Families, Communities And The Public Space

The harm goes beyond the accused. Families face social harm, loss of work and ongoing fear. Neighbours distance themselves. Children grow up with a sense that justice only reaches those with power. Communities learn that speaking up will bring trouble, and so silence spreads. The shrinking of public space means fewer voices in politics and less room for peaceful change. That loss is a heavy price for any democracy.

Everyday Repression :
• Family damage: Arrests harm the income and safety of whole families.
• Social fear: People avoid public life to escape harassment.
• Lost debate: Fewer voices mean worse choices in politics and law.

Human Rights And The Need For Global Action

There is no licence for any state to trample human rights in the name of nation building. When minorities and critics are treated as enemies and basic rules of justice are ignored, the whole idea of rights becomes empty. The world cannot stand by while a major state treats its people as second class or uses law to push a single religious or national idea. Democracies and human rights groups must act, not with empty words, but with clear steps to ensure fairness and to stop daily abuses.

Steps The World Should Take :
• Demand full access: Ask for public review of the evidence in high profile cases.
• Back independent checks: Support neutral observers to look at whether due process is followed.
• Use diplomatic weight: Nations that speak for rights must press India to meet basic standards.

What Justice Should Be

Real justice means fair defence, quick hearings and decisions based on clear proof. Investigations must not be shaped by politics. Courts must stand free and protect people’s rights. Media must report with care and balance. Only when these basics are restored can public trust return and normal political life continue without fear of sudden arrest or false charge.

Conclusion: Accountability Not Impunity

Yasin Malik’s affidavit is more than a plea. It is proof of how accusation can replace proof and how power can be used to crush dissent. When the state uses law as a weapon, and when the press becomes its echo, the rule of law dies and the lives of ordinary people are at risk. The international community must press for clear, open checks and must not let patterns of daily abuse become normal. India must be held to account for how it treats its people and must be made to show that no one is above the laws that are meant to protect us all. The test of any nation’s strength is its ability to treat every person with fairness and to let truth guide its courts and its history.