India’s Transnational Terrorism Exposed: SFJ Says A 2023 Memo Signed By Vinay Kwatra Orders RAW IB And NIA To Target Pro Khalistan Activists Abroad

India’s Transnational Terrorism Under Scrutiny

Sikhs for Justice says a secret memo from 2023 signed by Vinay Mohan Kwatra orders Indian agencies to act against pro Khalistan activists abroad, and it names targets while using embassies and selected Hindu groups as support. The claim turns diplomatic space into a base for pressure and at times for force, and it echoes the fear that spread after the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Canada, while India calls the memo false yet gives no proof that settles the matter in court.

• Key Claim: The memo, as shown by SFJ, names Hardeep Singh Nijjar who was later killed in Canada.
• Public Alarm: The story moved fast from social media talk to police briefings and news desks.

The Memo Claim And Orders

SFJ describes a clear line of orders from the foreign office to RAW IB and NIA, with tasks that include watch lists, pressure calls, travel help, and quick moves across borders against named persons. If this paper is real, it shows a state plan to hit dissent outside India without host consent, which breaks law and puts a community at risk in countries that value free speech and safety.

• Signature And Year: SFJ says the paper bears Vinay Mohan Kwatra’s signature and the year 2023.
• Lead Agencies: RAW IB and NIA are placed in front with support teams abroad.

Embassies As Hubs And Use Of Local Groups

The account places Indian missions in Ottawa Washington and New York at the centre of the work, where staff gather files, hold meetings, assign tasks, and move money under cover of routine office work. It also says select Hindu groups help shape the ground by pushing back critics and giving street level strength, which pulls civic space into a state drive and breaks trust in public life.

• Control Through Missions: Embassies are shown as planning rooms and task posts for teams on the ground.
• Role Of Groups: Select Hindu groups are used to shadow critics and to influence public talk.

Nijjar Case And Canada’s Response

The killing of Nijjar outside a gurdwara in Surrey turned quiet worry into open fear and forced Canada to treat threats to Sikh leaders as a live security issue. It brought to one point the reports of watch lists, phone abuse, and unknown men at doors, and it matched the pattern that SFJ says sits inside the memo.

• Named In Paper: SFJ says the memo lists Nijjar as a target for action abroad.
• Call For Safety: Sikh bodies asked for stronger police cover and open trials.

Police And Intelligence Alerts In Canada

SFJ says it has written to Prime Minister Mark Carney and says the RCMP and CSIS know of plots tied to India on Canadian soil, and public notes show a higher risk level for Sikh activists. This stance pulls the issue from routine talk into the space of law where records can be tested and where any outside hand must face open trial.

• Notice To Top Office: SFJ says it has informed the Prime Minister about present threats.
• Police Line: RCMP and CSIS say they will act fast on any plan that targets activists.

Pattern Of Pressure Across Borders

Sikh activists in North America Europe and Australia report watch lists, visa blocks, online hate, and sudden stops on public events, with some also speaking of strange visits by unknown men who pass threats. Rights bodies call this pressure across borders, and they note that the tools may change but the aim is the same, which is to scare critics into silence and to show that reach has no limit.

• Reports From Many Places: Accounts from several regions show tracking and pressure on Sikh voices.
• Chill On Free Speech: Fear spreads and weakens trust in the rule of law.

Law And Diplomacy

Embassies are meant for state to state work and service to citizens, not for secret action against critics, and any such use breaks clear rules and invites a strong reply by host states. These acts also raise costs for trade study and travel, hurt people to people ties, and stain the image of a state that seeks a larger role but falls short on respect for law abroad.

• Rules And Trust: Using missions for secret acts breaks law and destroys trust that keeps ties steady.
• Daily Costs: Abuse of privilege harms business, student visas, travel plans, and normal contact.

India’s Denial And The Test Of Proof

New Delhi calls the memo fake and the story a smear, but denial is not proof, and fair process needs records in court and answers to lawful questions where acts are said to have taken place. Those who make claims must present solid proof and those who face claims must cooperate with law, since truth in such grave matters must rest on open facts.

• Official Line: India rejects the memo and any plan for overseas action.
• Court First: Only open courts with full records can settle orders roles and acts.

What Must Happen Now

Host states must protect named activists through hotlines patrols and quick response to any threat, as delay costs lives and spreads fear. India should stop any use of foreign soil for unlawful acts and should meet lawful requests for data and testimony, while civil groups must reject violence so that politics is done by speech vote and courts and not by force.

• Protect Those At Risk: Clear contact points and fast police action reduce danger at once.
• Cooperate With Law: India should meet lawful requests and restrain any officer or contact from unlawful acts.

Conclusion A Firm Line Against Unlawful Action

The SFJ claim throws a sharp light on India’s work beyond its borders and exposes a dark method that uses embassies and select groups to target critics and to turn foreign soil into a field for fear and force. India may deny the memo, but rising alerts and hard cases demand action under law, not more words, and the rule must be simple and firm that no cause allows secret hits across borders and that any such plan, if proved, must bring swift penalty for those who ordered and those who acted.