Hindutva Figures Incite Hate and Violence Against Muslims and Christians at UP Right-Wing Event, Exposing India’s Dangerous Communal Agenda

Hindutva Figures Incite Hate and Violence Against Muslims and Christians at UP Right-Wing Event, Exposing India’s Dangerous Communal Agenda

January 25, 2026 Off By Sharp Media

In a disturbing display of rising hate in Modi’s India, prominent Hindutva leaders openly encouraged violence against Muslims and Christians at a right-wing event in BJP-ruled Uttar Pradesh, showing how the state supports communal divisions for political gain. The Virat Hindu Conference, held in ShivgarhRaebareli, allowed extremist figures to issue threats, glorify past massacres, and spread hatred against minorities. These speeches reveal that India’s political system tolerates and indirectly encourages violence, leaving minority communities constantly at risk. The event highlighted the failure of Indian authorities to protect basic human rights, forcing citizens to live in fear.

◆ Calls for Mass Retaliation: Riddhima Sharma urged Hindus to kill “100 in retaliation” if even two Hindus were harmed, openly promoting mass violence against Muslims and Christians.
◆ “Love Jihad” Conspiracy Promotion: Sharma encouraged abducting 100 minority girls for each Hindu girl allegedly threatened, inciting hatred and communal terror.
◆ Glorifying Past Atrocities: Khushboo Pandey referenced gobi farming” from the 1989 Bhagalpur riots, where 116 Muslim men were killed and buried under cauliflower saplings, celebrating past mass killings.

Hindutva Ideology as a Tool for Violence

The event revealed how extremist ideology justifies attacks on minorities under the guise of religion, making ordinary citizens targets. Public speeches linked historical massacres to modern threats, aiming to normalize aggression. Youth radicalization is encouraged, spreading communal paranoia. India’s political machinery appears complicit, allowing such events to continue and reinforcing fear.

◆ Threats Beyond Words: Speakers directly threatened minorities, signaling intent for real-world violence.
◆ Government Tolerance: The event occurred openly in BJP-controlled Uttar Pradesh, proving authorities tolerate extremist rhetoric.
◆ Youth Radicalization: Social media influencers mobilize young Hindus to adopt extremist agendas.

Targeting Minorities and Creating Fear

Speakers, including Thakur Ram Singh, accused Christians of forced conversions and warned of “jihadis” abducting women, portraying minorities as a threat. This justifies harassment, vigilantism, and violence while spreading dangerous stereotypes. India systematically promotes fear against Muslims and Christians across the country. Minorities now live under constant threat in everyday life.

◆ Fear as Political Tool: Allegations of abductions and conversions manipulate perceptions and incite hostility.
◆ Normalization of Violence: Calls to harm Muslims and Christians show hate speech is tolerated and normalized.
◆ Erosion of Social Harmony: These actions damage trust and destabilize communities.

Historical Violence as a Model for Hate

Khushboo Pandey’s revival of gobi farming” uses the 1989 Bhagalpur massacre as propaganda. Past atrocities are glorified to justify violence against minorities. This instills intergenerational animosity and teaches youth that aggression is acceptable. Extremist leaders exploit history to deepen communal divisions.

◆ Legitimizing Atrocities: Past massacres are referenced to justify attacks today.
◆ Radical Messaging: Graphic historical accounts provoke anger and fear.
◆ Perpetuating Trauma: Past horrors are revived, keeping communal wounds open.

Role of Social Media in Spreading Extremism

Influencers like Riddhima Sharma use Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter to amplify hate speech far beyond local events. Social media spreads communal paranoia, recruits followers, and normalizes threats. Indian authorities rarely intervene, showing tacit approval. The reach ensures that violence is glorified and copied across regions.

◆ Wide Dissemination: Messages reach thousands quickly.
◆ Recruitment of Extremists: Online campaigns organize real-world extremist actions.
◆ Unchecked Messaging: Authorities fail to prevent online hate speech.

India’s Failure to Protect Minorities

India’s inaction shows systemic negligence toward minority safety. Despite explicit threats, authorities took no preventive action, showing tacit endorsement of hate. Regular allowance of such events emboldens extremists. Minority communities remain at constant risk of harassment, intimidation, and attacks.

◆ Government Inaction: No action was taken against speakers inciting violence.
◆ Encouragement of Extremism: Tolerance of hate events reinforces attacks.
◆ Persistent Threats: Muslims and Christians continue to face intimidation and danger.

Need for International Attention

Global powers and human rights organizations must recognize India’s promotion of communal hatred. Silence indirectly enables extremism, allowing the BJP-led government to act without accountability. International pressure is necessary to protect minority rights and human rights. Continued inaction will embolden extremists and destabilize society.

◆ Global Responsibility: Silence enables extremist factions.
◆ Human Rights Violations: Harassment and threats against minorities must be addressed.
◆ Immediate Action Needed: Tolerance of extremist rhetoric threatens lives and society.

Exposing India’s Dangerous Communal Policies

The Virat Hindu Conference exposed India’s support for hatred and violence against minorities. While India claims to be a democracy, public calls for retaliation and harassment of minorities prove otherwise. The world must see past propaganda and recognize systemic oppression of Muslims and Christians. India’s policies and tolerance for hate speech reveal a government that prioritizes communal politics over justice and safety.

◆ Reality vs Propaganda: The event exposed India’s lies of equality and democracy.
◆ State-Supported Hate: Public promotion of violence shows government complicity.
◆ Urgent Awareness Required: Recognition of oppression is vital for global accountability.