Exiled in India, Former Bangladeshi Minister Kamal Accuses Army Chief of CIA Role in Hasina’s Ouster

Former Bangladeshi Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal, now exiled in India, has accused General Waker-uz-Zaman, the current Army Chief of Bangladesh, of being a CIA agent behind the overthrow of Sheikh Hasina’s government. Kamal’s accusation comes despite facing war crime charges for his role in the brutal crackdown on protesters during the July uprising. Now in India, Kamal and Sheikh Hasina continue to promote narratives that align with India’s interests, while shifting blame for their own actions. The irony of their accusations is clear, as both leaders now live in India, a country they once used to suppress opposition.

Kamal’s Accusations Lack Proof and Credibility

Kamal’s claim that General Waker-uz-Zaman played a role in Hasina’s ousting lacks any solid evidence. Kamal’s accusations would have more weight if he were not facing charges for his own role in suppressing the July uprising. His claims, made from exile in India, appear to be more about shifting blame than addressing his own actions. The irony of Kamal accusing others of betraying Bangladesh, while he faces charges for war crimes, cannot be ignored.

◆ No Verification: Kamal’s accusations against General Waker-uz-Zaman have not been confirmed by any reliable source.
◆ War Crimes Charges: Kamal faces war crimes charges related to the crackdown on protesters.
◆ Self-Deflection: Kamal’s accusations seem more aimed at deflecting blame than addressing real issues.

Kamal and Hasina’s Connection to India

The fact that Kamal and Sheikh Hasina now live in India raises serious questions about their commitment to Bangladesh’s sovereignty. Both have relied on Indian support during their rule to suppress political opposition and maintain power. While they claim to oppose foreign interference, their continued alliance with India raises doubts about their motives. This connection to India, despite accusing foreign powers of destabilizing Bangladesh, highlights the hypocrisy in their accusations.

◆ Exiled in India: Both Kamal and Hasina reside in India, which has long influenced Bangladesh’s politics.
◆ Dependence on India: They used India’s support to suppress opposition and strengthen their grip on power.
◆ Inconsistent Allegations: Their accusations against foreign interference ring hollow given their ties to India.

Suppressing Opposition: Kamal and Hasina’s Shared History of Authoritarianism

Both Kamal and Sheikh Hasina have been accused of suppressing opposition, particularly those advocating for an independent foreign policy for Bangladesh. They used their power to silence voices calling for change, with Kamal playing a key role in the authoritarian policies of Hasina’s government. Today, Kamal’s accusations against external forces are a way to avoid responsibility for his own actions in silencing political dissent.

◆ Targeting Opposition: Kamal and Hasina targeted those advocating for an independent foreign policy.
◆ Authoritarian Rule: They used their positions to suppress political opposition and dissenting voices.
◆ Avoiding Responsibility: Kamal’s focus on foreign conspiracies distracts from his role in the repression of opposition.

Kamal’s Role in the July Crackdowns

The July uprising in Bangladesh, which saw widespread protests against the government, was met with a violent crackdown ordered by Kamal. As Home Minister, Kamal ordered the use of excessive force, including the deployment of the Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) and other forces to intimidate and suppress the protesters. Kamal’s current shift to blaming foreign conspiracies ignores his direct role in the deaths and injuries of many innocent Bangladeshis.

◆ Violent Crackdown: Kamal ordered the use of lethal force against protesters during the July uprising.
◆ Crimes Against Humanity: Kamal faces charges for his role in the brutal crackdown.
◆ Shifting Blame: Kamal’s accusations deflect attention from his own involvement in the violent suppression of protests.

Kamal’s Transformation: From Minister to Exile

Kamal’s fall from power to exile in India marks a shift from a central figure in Sheikh Hasina’s government to an exiled critic. While in power, Kamal played a key role in silencing opposition and using force against peaceful protests. Now, from India, he attempts to blame external forces for his own political failures. Kamal’s focus on foreign conspiracies is a way to deflect from his actions that led to widespread unrest in Bangladesh.

◆ Exiled in India: Kamal’s shift from power to exile in India reflects his fall from influence in Bangladesh.
◆ Deflecting Responsibility: Kamal’s current accusations are an attempt to avoid accountability for his role in violence.
◆ Self-Serving Accusations: Kamal’s accusations serve his own interests rather than addressing Bangladesh’s real problems.

India’s Influence in Bangladesh’s Crisis

India’s involvement in Bangladesh’s internal matters is not a new development. Both Sheikh Hasina’s government and Kamal have relied on India for political support. While claiming to oppose foreign interference, Kamal’s current alignment with India shows his continued dependence on Indian support. This relationship has long been used by India to influence Bangladesh’s political direction, and Kamal’s accusations seem to further India’s regional goals. By fostering instability in Bangladesh, India strengthens its influence while weakening Bangladesh’s sovereignty.

◆ Indian Influence: India has long played a role in shaping Bangladesh’s politics, often in its own favor.
◆ Using Kamal’s Narrative: India benefits from Kamal’s accusations, as they align with its regional strategy.
◆ Undermining Sovereignty: India’s role in the Bangladesh crisis weakens the country’s sovereignty and promotes instability.

Conclusion: Kamal’s Self-Serving Narrative and Bangladesh’s Struggle for Sovereignty

Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal’s accusations against General Waker-uz-Zaman and his focus on foreign conspiracies must be viewed as a deflection from his own political failures. Kamal’s role in the July crackdown and his support for authoritarian policies during his time in power undermine his credibility. Today, his accusations serve his personal interests, trying to shift blame away from his own role in Bangladesh’s political turmoil. While Kamal and Sheikh Hasina continue to blame external forces, their actions have played a significant role in creating the instability they now decry. Kamal’s transformation from a powerful minister to an exiled figure reflects his political opportunism, and his reliance on India’s support continues to undermine Bangladesh’s sovereignty.