Faulty Pahalgam Investigation and India’s Baseless Claims Fully Exposed

Blame Politics Used to Hide Kashmir’s Reality

India has once again used an incident in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir as a tool to blame Pakistan and suppress the legitimate Kashmiri freedom struggle. Instead of addressing the long-standing political dispute and serious human rights violations in the region, New Delhi continues to label Kashmiri resistance as terrorism. This strategy is designed to exploit global fears while avoiding accountability for its own actions. The 15 December charge sheet filed by India’s National Investigation Agency is a calculated attempt to divert attention from grave human rights violations in IIOJK and mislead the international community.

♦ Blame as state policy: India repeatedly uses accusations against Pakistan to silence Kashmir voices and hide its own failures.
♦ Diversion tactic: Legal cases are used to shift global focus away from rights abuses in occupied Kashmir.
♦ Narrative control: India prefers propaganda over truth to control international opinion.

Eight-Month Delay Shows Weak and Biased Investigation

After an unusual delay of eight months, India’s National Investigation Agency submitted its charge sheet in a special court in Jammu. Such a long delay clearly reflects confusion, weak evidence, and political pressure on investigators. If India had solid proof, the case would not have required months of silence. This delay strongly suggests that the investigation was shaped to support a political narrative rather than uncover facts.

♦ Delayed justice: The long delay highlights the absence of clear and reliable evidence.
♦ Political pressure: Investigators appear to have worked under instructions, not independence.
♦ Credibility damage: The delay has badly weakened India’s claims.

A 1,597-Page Charge Sheet Without Any Solid Proof

India presented a 1,597-page charge sheet to create an illusion of seriousness, yet failed to present even one piece of concrete or credible evidence. The document names six individuals, but relies on allegations, assumptions, and forced statements instead of facts. Length has been used to hide weakness, not to strengthen the case. This exposes how Indian agencies replace evidence with paperwork.

♦ Paper over truth: Volume is used to cover the lack of real proof.
♦ Allegation-based case: Claims are made without verification or independent support.
♦ Legal weakness: Such cases cannot survive fair judicial review.

Torture and Forced Confessions Reveal India’s Brutal Methods

The Pahalgam charge sheet is mainly based on so-called confessional statements of three poor Kashmiri shepherds. Credible reports confirm that these individuals were tortured in custody to extract false confessions. Confessions obtained through torture have no legal value and violate basic human rights. This exposes the cruelty and lawlessness of Indian investigating agencies.

♦ Forced statements: Torture was used to manufacture a false case.
♦ Human rights abuse: Indian agencies violated basic legal and moral standards.
♦ Judicial concern: Custodial confessions cannot replace evidence.

Civilian Killings and False Pakistani Identity Claims Collapse

Indian forces allegedly killed three civilians during search operations and later portrayed them as Pakistani nationals to link Pakistan with the incident. The claim that the victims carried Pakistani voter identity cards is openly false, as Pakistan does not issue voter ID cards. This lie alone exposes the complete failure and lack of basic sense within Indian investigating agencies.

♦ Fake identity claims: False Pakistani links were created after civilian killings.
♦ Basic fact ignored: India’s claim collapses against simple facts.
♦ Self-exposure: Investigators revealed their own incompetence.

Media Trials and the Role of Godi Media Propaganda

The cases of Pervaiz Ahmed and Bashir Ahmed, arrested on 22 June, further expose India’s misuse of media. Instead of a transparent public trial, fake confessions were aired on Indian Godi media. Television studios replaced courts, and propaganda replaced justice. This reflects how deeply politicized India’s media and institutions have become.

♦ Media as court: TV channels declared guilt before any trial.
♦ No transparency: Legal process was ignored for propaganda.
♦ Public deception: Media was used to mislead people.

Smear Campaign Against Pakistan and Rejection of Fair Inquiry

Immediately after the Pahalgam incident, Indian electronic and social media launched a coordinated smear campaign against Pakistan. Pakistan offered a fair, transparent, and impartial investigation, but India rejected it. Instead of cooperation, New Delhi chose open accusations without evidence. This behavior shows fear of truth and independent scrutiny.

♦ Propaganda drive: Smear campaigns replaced responsible investigation.
♦ Rejected transparency: India refused neutral and fair inquiry.
♦ Domestic politics: Accusations were used to calm Indian public opinion.

Kashmir’s Legal Status and India’s Open Violations

Jammu and Kashmir is an internationally recognized disputed territory and has remained on the UN Security Council agenda for over seven decades. UNSC resolutions 47, 51, 91, and 122 clearly demand a plebiscite, which India accepted but never honored. India is not the legal owner of Kashmir and has no right to decide its future. Actions since 5 August 2019, including revoking Article 370 and demographic changes, violate international law and the Fourth Geneva Convention.

♦ Illegal actions: India continues to violate UN resolutions.
♦ Demographic engineering: Policies aim to weaken Kashmiri Muslim identity.
♦ No legal authority: India cannot decide Kashmir’s future alone.

Manufactured Cases Cannot Hide the Kashmir Truth

The Pahalgam investigation stands exposed as weak, biased, and politically driven. Built on torture, false claims, media trials, and propaganda, it lacks legal and moral credibility. Such manufactured cases cannot silence Kashmir or hide India’s human rights abuses. Pakistan remains committed to supporting the UN-backed right to self-determination of the Kashmiri people, and lasting peace in South Asia will remain impossible until India abandons false blame and respects international law.

♦ India exposed: False narratives collapse under facts.
♦ Justice denied: Manufactured cases replace accountability.
♦ Peace blocked: Kashmir remains central to regional stability.